Persepsi Mahasiswa Pascasarjana PAI terhadap Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan: Ditinjau menggunakan Evaluasi Model CIPP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/jupendir.v3i1.1032Keywords:
CIPP Model, Educational Evaluation, Facilities and Infrastructure, Islamic Religious Education, Student PerceptionsAbstract
This study was motivated by the importance of the availability and quality of infrastructure as a major supporting factor for the comfort and smooth running of the lecture process at the postgraduate level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate educational facilities and infrastructure based on the perceptions of postgraduate students in the Islamic Education Study Program (PAI) using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model. This research is an evaluative study with a qualitative approach, involving PAI graduate students as research subjects. Data collection was conducted through questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and field observations, then analyzed using the Question Discourse technique to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the students' experiences and assessments. The results show that students view facilities and infrastructure as important to very important in supporting the lecture process. In general, the facilities are considered adequate, but there are still limitations in the air conditioning system and internet network stability, which affect the comfort and effectiveness of learning. The implications of this study emphasize the need for continuous improvement in the quality, maintenance, and management of facilities and infrastructure to support the quality of PAI postgraduate education.
References
Asfaroh, J. A., Rosana, D., & Supahar. (2025). Development of the evaluation instrument use CIPP on. AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995190
Bileti, E. A., Ndawula, S., Kebirungi, H., & Rwothumio, J. (2024). Physical infrastructure management and curriculum implementation in public universities in Northern Uganda. The Uganda Higher Education Review Journal, 12(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.58653/nche.v12i1.7
Bolatimi, O. S., & Bolatimi, F. E. (2025). Student satisfaction with university facilities and services and its impact on academic performance at Koforidua Technical University Ghana. Springer, 4(492), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00913-9
Fatima, O.-U. M., & Joshua, C. E. (2024). Roles of infrastructure and ICT facilities in enhancing curriculum implementation in Nigerian tertiary institutions. British Journal of Contemporary Education, 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.52589/BJCE-C8D8CONZ
Gloria, D. S., Pelayo, E. T. C., & Castro, R. D. (2025). The role of infrastructure and student satisfaction in higher education: Inputs for campus development plan. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 83(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/25.83.501
Goffar, A., & Agustin, L. (2021). Management of facilities and infrastructure in improving quality of graduates. The International Journal of High Education Scientist (IJHES), 2(2), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1234/.v2i2.177
Government of Australia. (2023). Guidance note: Facilities and infrastructure. TEQSA: Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.
Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale: Development, reliability and validity. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146
Hall, S., & Liebenberg, L. (2024). Qualitative description as an introductory method to qualitative research for master’s-level students and research trainees. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264
Ibeneme, & Izundu, L. (2023). Utilization of school facilities: Implications for effective instructional delivery in technical education programmes in South-East Nigerian colleges of education. International Journal of Education and Evaluation (IJEE), 9(7), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.56201/ijee.v9.no7.2023.pg137.146
Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Lee, S., Shin, J., & Lee, S. (2019). How to execute context, input, process, and product evaluation model in medical health education. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 16(40), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.40
Mahmoud, A. S., Hassanain, M. A., & Alshibani, A. (2024). Evolving trends and innovations in facilities management within higher education institutions. Buildings, 14, Article 3759. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123759
Olatunji, S. (2021). Evaluation of infrastructure in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. Ghana Journal of Geography, 13(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjg.v13i1.5
Rahmanullah, F., Barliana, M. S., Meirawan, D., & Maknun, J. (2021). An evaluation of educational facilities and infrastructure in vocational high school. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 520, 248–252. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210203.127
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 117–141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_7
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models. In D. L. Stufflebeam (Ed.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 7–98). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.3
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007a). CIPP evaluation model checklist. BetterEvaluation. https://www.betterevaluation.org/tools-resources/cipp-evaluation-model-checklist
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007b). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 279–317). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16
Thuy, T., Ngo, A., Thanh, C., Khanh, H., Chau, L., Phuc, N., Tran, N., Phuong, P., Nguyen, T., Khiet, N., & Tran, T. (2025). Influence of university service quality on student experiences, academic performance and institutional loyalty: A case study in Vietnam. Acta Psychologica, 260, Article 105599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105599
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pendidikan Dirgantara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
